Here's an interesting set of figures. In the 2005 general election Labour won 286 of the 529 English seats at Westminster with a 35.5% share of the vote. The Conservatives won 194 seats with a 35.7% share of the vote.
So somehow, the political arithmetic of the first past the post system worked in such a way as to give Labour a majority of English seats, despite getting less votes than the Conservatives. Is this really representative democracy?
Of course, had we a PR system, neither party would have a majority so the chances are we would have had a coalition. On PR, an English parliament would have 189 Conservative MPs, 187 Labour and a sizeable 121 Liberal Democrat. Now as a Conservative supporter, I have no wish to see the Liberal Democrats in goverment, but if the people vote for a hung parliament, then then that's their will and I can live with that. What I can't accept is that a single party getting 35.5% of the vote can walk away with 54.1% of the seats and claim to have a mandate to govern from the English people.
PETA Planning to Crash Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest With Vegan Dog
Giveaway
-
PETA clearly believes the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest is the wurst ...
as it tells TMZ Sports it's planning to crash the annual shindig this week
in an...
No comments:
Post a Comment